Skip to content

Claude Fable 5 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Claude Fable 5 grades higher overall (90.7 against 36.5). Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct costs 99% less for the same work.

Claude Fable 5

by Anthropic · #3 of 67 overall

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
1M
Input / 1M
$10.00
Output / 1M
$50.00

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

by Meta · #57 of 67 overall

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
320K
Input / 1M
$0.10
Output / 1M
$0.30

Better overall

Claude Fable 5

Grade 90.7 vs 36.5

Cheaper

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

99% less, $0.15 vs $20.00 blended

Larger context

Claude Fable 5

1M vs 320K tokens

Head to head

Public benchmarks. Longer is better; each value links to its source.

LMArena TextElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 15, 2026
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5: 1,503
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: 1,322
LMArena WebDevElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 13, 2026
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5: 1,624
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: —
LMArena CodingElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 15, 2026
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5: 1,551
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: 1,363
SWE-bench Verified% of issues resolved · SWE-bench · Jun 9, 2026 · reference
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5: 95%v
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: —
SWE-Bench Pro% of tasks resolved · Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro · Jun 9, 2026 · reference
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5: 80%v
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: —
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks passed · Terminal-Bench · Jun 9, 2026 · reference
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: —

Claude Fable 5Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instructv = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.

What it costs you

Drag to match your monthly usage.

Claude Fable 5$4,000 /month
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct$32.00 /month

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct saves you $3,968 a month at this usage, $47,616 a year.

At a glance

AttributeClaude Fable 5Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct
Made byAnthropicMeta
AvailabilityComing soonComing soon
Overall gradeExcellent · 90.7Good · 36.5
Overall rank#3 of 67#57 of 67
Input price$10.00 per 1M$0.10 per 1M
Output price$50.00 per 1M$0.30 per 1M
Context window1,000,000 tokens327,680 tokens
Reasoning levelsYesNo
Reads imagesYesYes
Model IDclaude-fable-5llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct

Try both with one key

Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.

Get your API key
# Ask either model the same thing
curl https://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"model": "claude-fable-5", "messages": [...]}'

# …then swap one word
  -d '{"model": "llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct", "messages": [...]}'

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5 or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct better?

Claude Fable 5 grades 90.7 against 36.5 for Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct, from public benchmarks.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: $0.10 in and $0.30 out per million tokens, against $10.00 and $50.00 through FullsendAI.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5, with 1,000,000 tokens.

Can I use both with one API key?

Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.

Model rankingsAll benchmarksCompare other models

Scores: LMArena (CC BY 4.0), SWE-bench, Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, and model makers’ published results where marked v. Prices are FullsendAI’s, per million tokens. Data as of Oct 28, 2026.