Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Claude Opus 4.7 has the stronger public benchmark scores. Qwen3.6 27B costs 90% less for the same work.

Claude Opus 4.7

by Anthropic · #6 of 67 overall

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
1M
Input / 1M
$5.00
Output / 1M
$25.00

Qwen3.6 27B

by Qwen

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
256K
Input / 1M
$0.32
Output / 1M
$3.20

Better overall

Claude Opus 4.7

Grade 87.3 vs —

Cheaper

Qwen3.6 27B

90% less, $1.04 vs $10.00 blended

Larger context

Claude Opus 4.7

1M vs 256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified

Claude Opus 4.7

87.6% vs 77.2%

Head to head

Public benchmarks. Longer is better; each value links to its source.

LMArena TextElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 13, 2026
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7: 1,501
Qwen3.6 27BQwen3.6 27B: —
LMArena WebDevElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 13, 2026
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7: 1,558
Qwen3.6 27BQwen3.6 27B: —
LMArena CodingElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 13, 2026
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7: 1,551
Qwen3.6 27BQwen3.6 27B: —
SWE-bench Verified% of issues resolved · SWE-bench · Apr 21, 2026 · reference
SWE-Bench Pro% of tasks resolved · Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro · Apr 21, 2026 · reference
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks passed · Terminal-Bench · Aug 5, 2026 · reference
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7: —
Terminal-Bench 2.0% of tasks passed · Terminal-Bench · Apr 21, 2026 · reference
LiveCodeBenchpass@1, % · LiveCodeBench · Apr 21, 2026 · reference
Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7: —

Claude Opus 4.7Qwen3.6 27Bv = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.

What it costs you

Drag to match your monthly usage.

Claude Opus 4.7$2,000 /month
Qwen3.6 27B$192 /month

Qwen3.6 27B saves you $1,808 a month at this usage, $21,696 a year.

At a glance

AttributeClaude Opus 4.7Qwen3.6 27B
Made byAnthropicQwen
AvailabilityComing soonComing soon
Overall gradeExcellent · 87.3Not rated
Overall rank#6 of 67Not ranked
Input price$5.00 per 1M$0.32 per 1M
Output price$25.00 per 1M$3.20 per 1M
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Reasoning levelsYesYes
Reads imagesYesYes
Model IDclaude-opus-4-7qwen3.6-27b

Try both with one key

Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.

Get your API key
# Ask either model the same thing
curl https://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"model": "claude-opus-4-7", "messages": [...]}'

# …then swap one word
  -d '{"model": "qwen3.6-27b", "messages": [...]}'

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.6 27B better?

One of them doesn’t have enough public benchmark scores to be graded yet; compare the benchmarks both have above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B: $0.32 in and $3.20 out per million tokens, against $5.00 and $25.00 through FullsendAI.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7, with 1,000,000 tokens.

Can I use both with one API key?

Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.

Model rankingsAll benchmarksCompare other models

Scores: LMArena (CC BY 4.0), SWE-bench, Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, LiveCodeBench, and model makers’ published results where marked v. Prices are FullsendAI’s, per million tokens. Data as of Oct 28, 2026.