Skip to content

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT grades higher overall (62.1 against 59.5). Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 74% less for the same work.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

by Google · #38 of 67 overall

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
256K
Input / 1M
$0.070
Output / 1M
$0.34

Muse Glimmer 30B

by Meta · #39 of 67 overall

Coming soon · price at launch
Context
128K
Input / 1M
$0.30
Output / 1M
$1.20

Better overall

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

Grade 62.1 vs 59.5

Cheaper

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

74% less, $0.14 vs $0.53 blended

Larger context

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT

256K vs 128K tokens

Head to head

Public benchmarks. Longer is better; each value links to its source.

LMArena TextElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 15, 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: 1,438
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 1,425
LMArena WebDevElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 13, 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: 1,359
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 1,355
LMArena CodingElo-style rating · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · Oct 15, 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: 1,483
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 1,479
SWE-bench Verified% of issues resolved · SWE-bench · reference
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 76%v
SWE-Bench Pro% of tasks resolved · Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro · reference
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 51.2%v
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks passed · Terminal-Bench · reference
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: 51.7%v
LiveCodeBenchpass@1, % · LiveCodeBench · Mar 11, 2026 · reference
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT: 77.1%v
Muse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: —

Gemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Glimmer 30Bv = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.

What it costs you

Drag to match your monthly usage.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT$27.60 /month
Muse Glimmer 30B$108 /month

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT saves you $80.40 a month at this usage, $965 a year.

At a glance

AttributeGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Glimmer 30B
Made byGoogleMeta
AvailabilityComing soonComing soon
Overall gradeStrong · 62.1Strong · 59.5
Overall rank#38 of 67#39 of 67
Input price$0.070 per 1M$0.30 per 1M
Output price$0.34 per 1M$1.20 per 1M
Context window262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Reasoning levelsNoNo
Reads imagesYesYes
Model IDgemma-4-26b-a4b-itmuse-glimmer-30b

Try both with one key

Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.

Get your API key
# Ask either model the same thing
curl https://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"model": "gemma-4-26b-a4b-it", "messages": [...]}'

# …then swap one word
  -d '{"model": "muse-glimmer-30b", "messages": [...]}'

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Glimmer 30B better?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT grades 62.1 against 59.5 for Muse Glimmer 30B, from public benchmarks.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: $0.070 in and $0.34 out per million tokens, against $0.30 and $1.20 through FullsendAI.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT, with 262,144 tokens.

Can I use both with one API key?

Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.

Model rankingsAll benchmarksCompare other models

Scores: LMArena (CC BY 4.0), SWE-bench, Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, LiveCodeBench, and model makers’ published results where marked v. Prices are FullsendAI’s, per million tokens. Data as of Oct 28, 2026.