Ling 3.1 FlashMeta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbov = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.
What it costs you
Drag to match your monthly usage.
Ling 3.1 Flash$96.00 /month
Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo$5.60 /month
Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo saves you $90.40 a month at this usage, $1,085 a year.
At a glance
Attribute
Ling 3.1 Flash
Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo
Made by
inclusionAI
Meta
Availability
Coming soon
Coming soon
Overall grade
Not rated
Good · 0.0
Overall rank
Not ranked
#67 of 67
Input price
$0.30 per 1M
$0.020 per 1M
Output price
$0.90 per 1M
$0.040 per 1M
Context window
262,144 tokens
131,072 tokens
Reasoning levels
No
No
Reads images
No
No
Model ID
ling-3.1-flash
meta-llama-3.1-8b-instruct-turbo
Try both with one key
Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.
# Ask either model the same thingcurlhttps://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \-H"Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \-d'{"model": "ling-3.1-flash", "messages": [...]}'# …then swap one word-d'{"model": "meta-llama-3.1-8b-instruct-turbo", "messages": [...]}'
Questions
Is Ling 3.1 Flash or Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo better?
One of them doesn’t have enough public benchmark scores to be graded yet; compare the benchmarks both have above.
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.1 Flash or Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo?
Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Turbo: $0.020 in and $0.040 out per million tokens, against $0.30 and $0.90 through FullsendAI.
Which has the larger context window?
Ling 3.1 Flash, with 262,144 tokens.
Can I use both with one API key?
Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.
Scores: LMArena (CC BY 4.0), Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, and model makers’ published results where marked v. Prices are FullsendAI’s, per million tokens. Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
