Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct TurboQwen2.5 72B Instructv = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.
What it costs you
Drag to match your monthly usage.
Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo$96.00 /month
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$88.00 /month
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct saves you $8.00 a month at this usage, $96.00 a year.
At a glance
Attribute
Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Made by
Meta
Qwen
Availability
Coming soon
Coming soon
Overall grade
Good · 26.8
Good · 31.6
Overall rank
#63 of 67
#61 of 67
Input price
$0.40 per 1M
$0.36 per 1M
Output price
$0.40 per 1M
$0.40 per 1M
Context window
131,072 tokens
32,768 tokens
Reasoning levels
No
No
Reads images
No
No
Model ID
meta-llama-3.1-70b-instruct-turbo
qwen2.5-72b-instruct
Try both with one key
Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.
# Ask either model the same thingcurlhttps://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \-H"Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \-d'{"model": "meta-llama-3.1-70b-instruct-turbo", "messages": [...]}'# …then swap one word-d'{"model": "qwen2.5-72b-instruct", "messages": [...]}'
Questions
Is Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct grades 31.6 against 26.8 for Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo, from public benchmarks.
Which is cheaper, Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: $0.36 in and $0.40 out per million tokens, against $0.40 and $0.40 through FullsendAI.
Which has the larger context window?
Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Turbo, with 131,072 tokens.
Can I use both with one API key?
Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.
