Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instructv = reported by the model’s maker. — = no public score yet. Arena bars span the range across every model we grade.
What it costs you
Drag to match your monthly usage.
Muse Glimmer 30B$108 /month
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$62.00 /month
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct saves you $46.00 a month at this usage, $552 a year.
At a glance
Attribute
Muse Glimmer 30B
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Made by
Meta
Qwen
Availability
Coming soon
Coming soon
Overall grade
Strong · 59.5
Strong · 62.5
Overall rank
#39 of 67
#37 of 67
Input price
$0.30 per 1M
$0.090 per 1M
Output price
$1.20 per 1M
$1.10 per 1M
Context window
131,072 tokens
262,144 tokens
Reasoning levels
No
Yes
Reads images
Yes
No
Model ID
muse-glimmer-30b
qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct
Try both with one key
Same endpoint, same key, both hosted in the USA. Change one word to switch models, in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline or your own code.
# Ask either model the same thingcurlhttps://fullsendai.com/v1/chat/completions \-H"Authorization: Bearer $FULLSEND_API_KEY" \-d'{"model": "muse-glimmer-30b", "messages": [...]}'# …then swap one word-d'{"model": "qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct", "messages": [...]}'
Questions
Is Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct better?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct grades 62.5 against 59.5 for Muse Glimmer 30B, from public benchmarks.
Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: $0.090 in and $1.10 out per million tokens, against $0.30 and $1.20 through FullsendAI.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, with 262,144 tokens.
Can I use both with one API key?
Yes, once they launch: both are coming soon, at the prices shown, and both will use the same FullsendAI key.
Scores: LMArena (CC BY 4.0), Aider (aider.chat), SWE-bench, Scale AI SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, LiveCodeBench, and model makers’ published results where marked v. Prices are FullsendAI’s, per million tokens. Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
